futurebit share comparison results

Hey everyone I thought it’d be cool to share our best share outcomes and maybe even some other results/settings you’ve got with your Futurebit full node. I’m really curious to see how they stack up for learning purposes. If you're interested too, drop your info below. Here are my current stats: Apollo2 Full Node plus 1 standard One Hour Average Hash Rate: 18.10TH Accepted Shares: 7,644,732,319 Best Share: 5,908,386,730 Been running Turbo mode for 5 days now.

Cool I like this! Lets see how many Trillion + best shares are out there. This is from our office node with an Apollo BTC standard attached: One Hour Average Hash Rate: 8.1TH Accepted Shares: 7,428,416,361 Best Share: 74,870,317,075 Uptime: 1M

One Hour Average Hash Rate: 10.90 TH/s Accepted Shares:     17,265,651,156 Best Share: 20,112,556,694 Running balanced mode 14 days up time

Thanks for joining! Nice Best Shares, I have been stuck at5,908,386,730 for 9 days now.

Apollo2 standard unit on Kano pplns pool Balance mode app. 5 mounths diff 4,859 shares 7,594,112    diff 29,874,444,690 share rate 6.93THs invalid 0.244% hash rate 7.38THs best 12.3G From wall 320W / 7,4 = 43 W/THs Eco mode 38 W/ THs my old S17pro on low power mode 39 W/ THs Apollo2 in NOT Eficientcy as they say (28 W/THs on www) Im sorry I bought it.

Apollo 1 Full node plus Apollo 2 standard running in eco mode One Hour Average Share: 7.33 TH/s Accepted Shares:  11,151,247,352 Best Share:  389,212,835,203 Uptime:  1 month

some great best shares, maybe I should drop mine to balanced mode it seems like you guys have much higher best shares yet im stuck for 10+ days at the same even in turbo mode. Thoughts? Does it matter, I am guessing no but you would think Turbo mode would draw higher best shares.

Apollo 2  full node with two Bitaxes One Hour Average: 9.82TH Accepted Shares : 24,025,143,130 Best Share: 45,902,932,799 Running in turbo during the winter. I reboot weekly.

Apollo2 full node, Apollo1 full node, 2x Apollo1 standard 1 Hr Avg Hashrate: 15.00 TH/s Accepted Shares: 1,388,854,417 Best Share: 1,748,153,388 Latest Uptime: 3 days

With 1x Apollo2 full node and 1x Apollo1 full node + 2 standard, I'm getting an avg 1hr hash rate of 15 TH/s with all in balanced mode. When the Apollo 1s were in turbo (Apollo2 in balanced) I was getting 16 TH/s avg hash rate. From an efficiency standpoint, it made sense to run them all in balanced. The best share of 1.7b over 3 days is similar to what I was getting when the miners were running 16 TH/s. My all-time best share has been around 3.2b over an uptime period of 1 week, whether the Apollo1s were running turbo or balanced. Might be worth playing around with balanced mode for a little while?

great suggestion. I did goto balanced mode and hash rate isnt much less. I also did a full reboot. At the moment these are my current stats. Apollo2 Full Node, plus 1 standard, Antminer S9 One Hour Average Hash Rate: 30.50TH Accepted Shares: 10,572,333,916 Best Share: 5,908,386,730 (been the same for close to 15 days)

UPDATE finally new best share...... First change in over 15 days Apollo2 Full Node, plus 1 standard, Antminer S9 One Hour Average Hash Rate: 30.40TH Accepted Shares: 11,575,487,537 Best Share: 132,337,685,248 (Antminer S9 on my LAN)

Hit a new best share a few days ago. Current stats are: Apollo2 Full Node (Balanced), Apollo1 Full Node + 2x Apollo1 Standard (Turbo) One Hour Average Hash Rate: 16.70 TH/s Accepted Shares: 6,985,020,957 Best Share: 4,795,487,684 Latest Uptime: 16 days

Its been over a month but my Apollo finally has a new best share One Hour Average Hash Rate: 32.40TH Accepted Shares: 37,276,343,306 Best Share: 7,833,616,635 Latest Uptime: over 1 month Still, my best share with the S9 is 132,337,685,248

Apollo2 Full Node (ECO), Apollo 2 Standard, + Bitaxe Supra One Hour Average Hash Rate: 11.40 TH/s Accepted Shares: 22,895,874,661 Best Share: 275,810,715,670 (Apollo 2) Latest Uptime: 1 month

Surprised that no one picked up on an Apollo I II node getting a block on the 21st. https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000000b7070e88525e4064ab36df7cfbe34d785bbc6eb491ea Details https://bitaps.com/888737 It had a diff of 393T.  393,692,033,929,762 to be precise What is not known is what miner was used - the one in the Apollo or did the winner point a buttload of rental hash at it.

This was already posted in the support thread with the details. Apparently the node was an Apollo I, not II, and the miner that found it was a S19K Pro. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5340015.msg65194813#msg65194813

@0id1d Merit given for that. The crypto magazines of course were late on it and left out all details of course... Nonetheless, great luck for the miner and glad to know it was personal hardware and not a shitton of rental.

Thank you, much appreciated. Yes, it's great that we were able to get the details this time straight from the person who mined the block.

Yesterday Apollo2 Full Node (Eco), Apollo1 Full Node + 2x Apollo1 Standard (Eco) One Hour Average Hash Rate: 11.7 TH/s Accepted Shares: 15,889,605,866 Best Share: 17,951,515,992 Latest Uptime: around 2.5 months Today 1Hr Avg Hash Rate: 12.9 TH/s (Balanced - all) Accepted Shares: 16,198,337,736 Best Share: 18,219,327,041 Nice to see best share climb in one day.