Upgrading My BTC Storage Strategy

8 replies 26 views
greggweiFull Member
Posts: 89 · Reputation: 321
#1May 10, 2023, 09:44 PM
Hey everyone I’m a bit of a BTC newbie and I’m looking for some advice on how to change up my BTC storage to boost both privacy and security. Here’s where I’m at: I made the mistake of buying my BTC from a KYC exchange. I haven’t changed my public key after each withdrawal either. Right now, I’m using Exodus as my hot wallet, but I really want to switch to cold storage for my BTC. Since I don’t plan on spending my BTC anytime soon, I’d rather prioritize security over convenience. I’ve got a few questions: - What’s the best way to make my BTC untraceable on the network? Like, how can I transfer my BTC to a new address that isn’t tied to my ID from that KYC exchange? - How can I keep the fees as low as possible while doing this? - What’s the best long-term storage solution for BTC? I’m thinking maybe a multi-sig setup could be ideal? Thanks a ton to anyone who can help out!
5 Reply Quote Share
HyperRavenFull Member
Posts: 175 · Reputation: 633
#2May 11, 2023, 01:09 AM
You can't make yourself untraceable. You can send them through CoinJoin or mixers which can break the link. You must ensure that you do not mix your addresses and thereby forming a link. Centralized KYC exchanges are known to block and ban accounts which deposits money from a mixer. You should take this into consideration as well and avoid spending funds linked with mixers to your exchange addresses. Consolidating your inputs could help: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2848987.0 Multisig isn't more secure than cold storage. You should ideally invest in a hardware wallet or setup a cold storage. If you're inexperienced in this domain, I recommend using a hardware wallet for a foolproof method of storage.
1 Reply Quote Share
greggweiFull Member
Posts: 89 · Reputation: 321
#3May 11, 2023, 05:11 AM
Thanks Yeah, this is actually what I meant. Not making myself untraceable per se, but rather breaking the link. I will switch to a non-KYC exchange though so getting this particular public key banned wouldn't bother me anyway. Let's see if the quote work, no idea how the formating works here
0 Reply Quote Share
byte_protoFull Member
Posts: 84 · Reputation: 625
#4May 11, 2023, 05:56 AM
In addition to ranochigo post, you should note not all wallet gives you the freedom to choose you wish for your transaction and one of such are exchanges but now that you are moving to a non-custodial wallet, it's good to know how to control fee and the link he shared is good. Hard wallet is most secure wallet for storing bitcoin but in addition with multi Sig then it becomes more efficient, choosing a good hardware wallet is important and you have to get it from the official dealer and not any random person or a used one but since you are incline with being cautious of your privacy I advise you don't go with Ledger, this thread will be helpful in picking one. 52 Hardware Wallets, compared feature by feature This would be helpful in knowing good non-KYC exchange https://kycnot.me/ You did get the formating well here is a [GUIDE] Bitcointalk forum etiquette
5 Reply Quote Share
humbleledgerLegendary
Posts: 1027 · Reputation: 6554
#5May 11, 2023, 11:36 AM
What problem are you trying to solve? Is it a problem that one KYC exchange knows how many coins you own? Who are you trying to hide from? Keeping a legal record of ownership can also benefit you in the future: if you want to sell some Bitcoin when it's worth a lot more, chances are the exchange, your bank or the tax man will ask questions. If you can answer: "I bought them at this exchange", it makes your life a lot easier than if you have to explain why you tried to hide your ownership.
0 Reply Quote Share
greggweiFull Member
Posts: 89 · Reputation: 321
#6May 11, 2023, 01:12 PM
From everybody I guess lol. Maybe that one exchange itself isn't a problem, but if a nation state would want to disclose everyone owning BTC, the exchange would of course hand over the information. I just like the idea that no one would be able to link me with a BTC address. At least at the moment given that not too many public organizations are BTC friendly. I don't think them embracing BTC in the future is given by any means. This is a really good point which I hadn't thought. I guess mention authorities would ask the question even if I had just sent BTC to a mixer. Gonna have to give this some thought.
3 Reply Quote Share
humbleledgerLegendary
Posts: 1027 · Reputation: 6554
#7May 11, 2023, 05:00 PM
Even if you hide your funds, and they can't link you to a specific Bitcoin address, they'll still link you to Bitcoin itself. If they knock on your door and ask you what you did with your Bitcoin, what are you going to tell them?
1 Reply Quote Share
greggweiFull Member
Posts: 89 · Reputation: 321
#8May 13, 2023, 03:14 PM
Yea, thought of this while writing the previous message. The authoriatarian state probably wouldn't care if I had a boating accident, they'd just imprison me either way Maybe it is just the idea of privacy that I'm attracted to. Probably the benefits of "Keeping a legal record of ownership" as you said,outweight the benefits of achieving unlinkability(is this a word?). Especially since the KYC mistake has already been made.
2 Reply Quote Share
humbleledgerLegendary
Posts: 1027 · Reputation: 6554
#9May 14, 2023, 12:10 AM
Hence my first question: "What problem are you trying to solve?" Even if you'd sell your Bitcoin on the same KYC exchange so you can show you have nothing left, the moment you use a non-KYC exchange to buy Bitcoin again it will be linked to your bank account. If I'd send/receive a large amount to/from an established exchange, my bank asks less questions than if that same amount comes from different unknown foreign bank accounts. If you withdraw cash from your bank account and buy Bitcoin P2P, you'll end up with a problem if you later sell and get a large amount of cash. That stuff becomes more and more restricted to spend in large amounts.
6 Reply Quote Share
?Reply
Sign in to reply to this topic

Related topics