So, just saw the SEC's announcement. Gary Gensler, for the first time, officially said that bitcoin is a commodity.
This is huge because it means the SEC won't be keeping tabs on any on-chain bitcoin stuff going forward.
We missed this key point: Bitcoin is now classified as a commodity
10 replies 486 views
Bitcoin was already a commodity, only now it is spelled out in law. There were no sales of Bitcoin, and who should the SEC bring charges against?
If you read official documents, the concept of ETP is used there. This is the legal name of the ETF, which is used in documents.
Now large investors do not need crypto exchanges; they can buy ETFs on large stock exchanges.
kevintokenFull Member
Posts: 33 · Reputation: 285
#3Jun 9, 2023, 10:56 AM
This is not the first time that SEC will say bitcoin is a commodity. I have been seeing it since 2020. Even I think the former SEC president also admitted that bitcoin is a commodity.
What I do not just like is the CFTC wants to recognize ethereum as a commodity. I do not know what game the CFTC president is playing.
Bitcoin is not security in anyway like those ethereum and all those premined coins. Also that many of those coins are using PoS which makes them securities.
Even if SEC do not yet call bitcoin a commodity, it is clear that it is a commodity. It was a commodity since the day it was created, unlike the altcoins.
The CFTC had already stated that Bitcoin was considered to be a commodity in 2015:
Coindesk coverage - CFTC ruling defines Bitcoin and Digital Currencies as commodities.
Here is another interesting article CFTC - A primer on digital currencies.
The CFTC also released a dummy version of the above later in 2019, Bitcoin Basics, which clearly defines how this agency defines Bitcoin.
It did go over peoples heads for a long time, it still does.
I believe also Gensler said while testifying that it's a commodity, but the communication was shady and confusing,
and this has never been put in written form by the SEC - as to my knowledge.
This is a political struggle for sphere of influence. The larger your sphere of influence, the larger your budget. This is how politics works in the US. Therefore, there are more than 20 special services that are engaged in similar activities.
The CFTC was interested in having Bitcoin recognized as a commodity in order to gain more control over it. But the SEC doesn't want to give its piece of the pie to anyone.
alt_oracleMember
Posts: 40 · Reputation: 173
#7Jun 11, 2023, 04:15 AM
That is what I have defended in this section. The bitcoin can not be created or issue at will, only mined and there is a finite amount, plus it is a demanded good. Therefore it is a commodity, regardless of whether a given country recognizes it as such or not. If it recognizes it for what it is, so much the better.
Precisely this I have also defended in other threads in this same section.
So some of us didn't overlook it at all, OP.
Yes, the only difference is that investment funds are forced to buy what it is worth for each satoshi that is printed, and therefore it is more likely that there will be dozens of platforms that may buy Bitcoin and there is liquidity for that.
The only difference between them and CEXs will be that you can withdraw Bitcoin to your wallet in the case of CEXs, while you cannot do that with ETFs, but the target investor group is people interested in the value of Bitcoin, not Bitcoin.
I am sure that in order to deposit and withdraw a large number of bitcoins from CEX will be a big problem for many companies. This is both the risk of blocking and the risk of storing an asset, and in the case of a spot ETF, this is more convenient for large players and companies will not disappear from the market.
Gary has to say that because what else could he say? The SEC has approved the ETF, so the vehicle of investment has to be defined one way or another. If it is not a security, then it is a commodity. And they definitely did not want to talk about it as a currency since that would make it look like a legit alternative to the CBDCs that they will launch. In any case, the impact on the price has been a classic sell the new events, now we will see just how much of a frontrun was this vs legit demand. Its been pumping for months and ROIs are crazy on proxies like miners and MSTR, cooldown incoming, 42k, 39k, 30k supports on the line, we'll see if those hold before halving effect kicks in.
satoshi2017Member
Posts: 1 · Reputation: 43
#11Jun 14, 2023, 10:44 PM
I do agree that the statement was shady, especially the part which vaguley linked Bitcoin to terrorist financing while claiming to be neutral;
The links provided to back up their claim has little substance with most of it being speculative.
Related topics
- What's stopping governments from banning Bitcoin? 19
- Purchasing Real Estate with Bitcoin 19
- Zug in Switzerland to Start Accepting Bitcoin and Ether for Taxes Next Year 12
- Why hasn't Bitcoin been legalized in many countries despite its growth? 19
- First Bitcoin ETF in Europe 9
- Bitcoin Donations and IRS Form 8283 Questions 16