cipher_2009

I believe I understand the point you all are making. In summary, you feel as though there's no way to design bins in a manner which would prevent people from simply circumventing them by cleverly designing their…

The intent of such partitioning *is not* to increase the fees of data transactions (though it may be a byproduct); the intent is to ensure that there's space in blocks available for BTC's intended usecase as a currency…

Perhaps P2TR could be its own transaction bin. Miners could, but they'd risk having their blocks rejected from nodes. I like the idea about quadratic weight assignment; but as you mentioned, it has it's own set of…

The average fee doesn't matter nearly as much as the median fee IMO. This should help bring down the latter.

Thanks for all the thoughts. Several things I'd like to point out: I don't believe a hard-fork should be required whenever allocations need to be altered. Allocations should be determined dynamically based on consensus…

Agreed on the requirements, neither of which appear insurmountable (1. Will likely be some sort of heuristic system, factoring in things like tx memsize, inscribed data, etc 2. Such rules would be built in directly to…

What if we set aside certain fixed (or gradually changing) portions of each block for specific transaction types? This might help tackle the issue of balancing high fees and blockchain accessibility. For instance, we…