GrimS1gma

If we assume efficient markets, it will drop significantly once you announce that you want to include a feature which worsens protection against double-spends Also, I don't think you should depend on the fact that stake…

I meant that attacker will reveal only block hashes or block headers, but not transactions in blocks. I don't quite understand cunicula's protocol, but it seems to be vulnerable. I think this fixes this problem. In…

OK, here's a full description of attacks which, I think, prove that PoA is not useful for anything, and is, in fact, harmful. A. For-profit double-spending. So I want to do for-profit double-spending. If I don't have…

I think it would help to clarify about what kinds of attacks it is designed to protect against. 51% attack does not say me anything, what is motive? I guess it's obvious that this scheme simply cannot help against…

Well I guess it's aimed primarily at byzantine attackers, at expense of higher small-scale reorgs. Also, doing calculated double-spends might be harder due to chaotic environment, but opportunistic double-spends might…

Good point. But I work mostly on "low-level" stuff, I'll forward this consideration to people who work on app level.

Why do you think it's a good thing? If we don't want them to be mixed, they can be mixed only accidentally. So, if accident happens, with order-based coloring you get uncolored output, so information is destroyed. Now…

It's more like "taint all the money!"

As I understand, this is largely compatible with order-based coin coloring, i.e. as long as transactions adhere to order-based coloring rules this proposal and order-based coloring will produce identical results. The…