mr_v3ct0r

We could have the reward decay the longer it takes users to sign blocks. But that only alleviates the issue. Point taken. Do you see a way to fix up this proposal so that it's not theoretically weaker?

killerstorm, I don't think your attack scenario is feasible. If he can pull of the double spends, the value of the currency will drop significantly. The attacker has to entice more than 50% of all stakeholders (in terms…

A double spend kind of needs to be done in secret. If it's out in the open, then the entity (like an exchange) that you are trying to double spend against will see that you are trying to perform a double spend attack…

There is a standard ordering of transactions in blocks, right? If not, having it alphabetized by address is fine. As long as all the nodes use the same deterministic way, we are good. Satoshi ending up as a fee is fully…

Satoshis are not tracked that way, but you could track it that way. You just need a deterministic way to do it. So just map every satoshi in the input to a satoshi in the output using an ordered 1 to 1 mapping. So for…

There's nothing inherently wrong for someone to sign a weaker fork because he was selected as a stakeholder in that fork. If his signature helps that fork become the best chain, then that is the best chain. The point is…

I'm throwing out a new idea for an alternative to Proof of Stake, which I'm calling Proof of Activity or PoA for short. The issue with the current PoS proposals is that they create a ton of extra network traffic and…

I've seen someone didnt get 1million USD withdraw for years on this site. Im sure its a scam, i found a thread about this 1million $ thing back in ~2019 maybe. But hopefully you get your funds , good luck :/

Looks like there aren't too many people mining fairbrix anymore. From allchains.info Litecoin has 5.69 mhash whereas Fairbrix only has .08 mhash. That's like 1.5% of Litecoin's network. Since interest is so low and the…

I think this only works with python 2.