Stuff like MTGOX and FTX is really hurting the crypto scene. Honestly, it's not even surprising anymore. Every day there's news about crypto companies going under and fresh scams popping up.
The whole FTX mess has pushed the US Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) to suggest that lawmakers take a closer look at new regulations for crypto.
So yeah, more regulations are definitely on the way in the coming months. But let's be real, regulation often comes at a cost and can cause more harm than good. Fingers crossed it doesn't end up stifling innovation and putting the brakes on the industry.
I don't like regulations, not only about privacy, but I fear that regulations will slow down the growth of the market. I believe most people enter the market because they like the volatility of cryptocurrencies, but once there is regulation, I fear that will disappear along with our privacy. Look at the stock market or the forex market, they are regulated, and they become more stable because they are tightly managed. Regulations are inevitable, but we can only hope they won't be too strict with us.
I don't know the kind of regulation that will be done on bitcoin itself because I don't see that coming. Countries can only try that people don't buy bitcoin but how will they know who is buying in decentralised exchange? They can only regulate centralised exchange and ask for KYC on customers and they monitor the exchange and the customer through that but I don't think total regulation like the forex is going to work.
Regulation will good if only hit the Centralized Exchange Market Only so other investor who scared about crypto like scam or fraud can at least breath because they know there is gov at least helping them.
we can take example of my country all legal cex should registered their company called Bappebti but the other negative side that we should talk with them incase want to Listing some coin/token
Regulations are inevitable, regardless of whether you like it or not! Such incidents like FTX are only making the process faster. It is putting more pressure on regulatory bodies to bring in a framework so that any such future events can be avoided.
I understand a lot of people don't like regulations but if exchanges are centralized and established as a legal entity, they are expected to follow certain regulations. So a more structured regulation will make the centralized businesses more transparent for its users.
The bad thing with huge exchange bankruptcies (like FTX and MtGox) is that they create ambience for regulations, and usually regulations do more harm than good when it comes to the free market.
Indeed. And the winners are mostly large corporations. Now, I don't know about you, but I don't like volatility. However, I neither believe more regulation will calm things down with no tradeoffs, though.
Mt Gox and FTX aren't both company should be blamed, but the whole centralized exchanges should be blamed especially if they're included in this list [1]
It's not surprising regulation will keep coming because hacker is always clever and better rather than the current security, this is why everyone should avoid to use centralized exchange. If people are move all from centralized exchange to decentralized exchange, there's will no regulation coming due to security excuse, they only want to control everyone activity.
[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5090869.0
I disagree. It alerts individuals to stay away from central enterprises when making investments. It demonstrates to the public that decentralized coins are robust, in contrast to centralized businesses that promoted ponzi schemes, which failed.
I think that regulations can be either good or bad, depending on various factors. On one hand, they can help build trust and confidence in the community. On the other hand, those who have been involved in the cryptocurrency industry for a while may not feel the need for regulations, as they have gained experience and are aware of many scams. However, regulations can also help protect newcomers from fraud and financial losses due to scams.
I'm all for low taxes and minimal regulations but I'm going to play devil's advocate in this case. In general when a successful industry is born, as cryptocurrencies would be in this case, the absence of regulations helps the business flourish. Not paying taxes, either because it is not foreseen in the legislation or because it is easy to escape them and the industry players do not pay them, also help the initial growth, as much more can be reinvested in the business.
But as the industries mature, some regulations become necessary so that it doesn't look like the Wild West and fraudsters run wild.
I would like regulations in which people who play an important role within the bitcoin ecosystem would be involved, which is not going to happen, as they will be made by politicians seeking to preserve their status quo, even though they may seek industry input to save face.
Oh buddy would they love witnessing that.
-----
I am convinced they are not clustering up regulations to prevent you from becoming a victim. Because then regulations would sound different. They are afraid of things they can not control. Such as Bitcoin and your actions if you have Privacy.
To me, only reason regulations are good is that businesses can get through the regulatory stuff easier and do not sit in a gray area of the market any more. Other than that, to us as customers and regular citizens there is nothing to win.
-
Regards,
PrivacyG
https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/sec-charges-thor-token-creators-for-26m-ico/
SEC Charges Thor Token Creators for $2.6m ICO
"Moravec has heard similar charges but has already decided to settle. Under the settlement, he cannot engage in cryptocurrency activities for three years, must pay a fine of $95,000 and disgorge $407,103 plus prejudgment interest of $72,209.45."
The SEC knows how to have fun, how many more projects will be punished?
Imho, Having more regulation is good rather than allowing big time scum bag freely steal people money using his shitcoin to rigged the DeFi scam scheme. People like Justin Sun will just keep stealing money if SEC didn't step in.
I believe there are lot of big people doing scam scheme like this freely since there is no regulators that protect consumers from this scheme. Poor TRX holders.
The FTX incident will certainly bring more stringent regulations against Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, but there is also something positive in favor of protecting users from similar incidents.
For example, the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies agreed to pass a law to legalize cryptocurrency as a means of payment, and the FTX collapse incident was taken into account and a clause was made in the law requiring exchanges to clearly distinguish between company funds and users:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/brazil-passes-law-to-legalize-crypto-as-a-payment-method
In my opinion, distinguishing between company assets and user assets is an important development in favor of protecting users from similar incidents in the future.
The actual damage is done by the media because they are the one who portrays in that way and its caused by ignorance of the individuals so how can be the cryptocurrency responsible for that. Stock market too have lot of restrictions but still many companies robbed their investors either directly or indirectly so regulations can't really stop the scam unless the investors get enough knowledge about what to do and not to do.
Unfortunately, the collapse of FTX and other centralized platforms have given an excuse to the regulators to enforce strict regulations in crypto industry. Now the regulators have an example of FTX that people money is being stolen and they should implement strict laws against crypto currencies.
There are centralized platforms whom motive is to earn money and they never care the growth of the crypto market.
Regulation has nothing to do with a decentralized platform, it could be applicable on the centralized platforms if this is your choice.
Might you forget the goal of the Bitcoin creator the reason why Bitcoin was created? What we can do now is to avoid centralized platforms to avoid more regulations.
After what we saw last year it was expected. I don't know if it will be bad like many think it's going to be, from the adoption point of view. I think it actually can have a very positive impact, because investors are looking for guarantees and safety when investing their money. If they see cases like FTX and Celsius without the industry addressing the issues and preventing it from happening again futurely, of course they will stay away from crypto market. But if they see regulations are coming to prevent new scams from happening, I believe it's very likely they will start investing again. Anyway, since regulations are a double edge sword, it's necessary to follow closely how they are being introduced, who is going to be benefited and what are their consequences for real.
I think what should be more important is the punishment for scammers and not just the legislation for what they should do but how it must be mandatorily retrieve the money of investors. The FTX exchange scam is one too many that investors lost huge money that is not traceable or gotten back. Regulation is good but it has to be strong enough to punish scammers.
Cryptocurrency and the evolution of blockchain technology is a real visible revolution in trading and worldwide monetary exchange. One key ruling by the SEC was that they decided that a Token represents a security by the company that issued that token.
https://www.theblock.co/post/197387/ftx-ftt-token-security-sec
This is wrong, and I truly hope that there a many lawyers around the globe fighting this rule by the SEC.
Example: Mattel makes dolls, and sells dolls, just like FTX made FTT tokens and sold them. But, just because investors by large quantities of some product does not make that company indebted to those buyers. If Mattel were to file bankruptcy like FTX, then Mattel would not owe any debt to all the investors who bought those dolls. Therefore, I believe that the SEC is truly wrong about calling any cryptocurrency a security. It is more like a commodity. Especially when many cryptocurrencies are decentralized, and there is no central company that controls their price or supply. That may not be true across all blockchain tokens, but my opinion is that the SEC is not the ruler of the world of finance, and the cryptocurrency business lawyers need to revolt and sue the SEC against their security ruling and forthcoming regulation. The SEC should stick to chasing down bad actors like SBF, Bernie Madoff, ENRON, etc. The flim-flam con-men who would use legitimate blockchain tokens for nefarious purposes.