New Novel Alert: The Day Satoshi Came Back 15 Years Later

10 replies 49 views
whale51Member
Posts: 5 · Reputation: 97
#1Jul 18, 2017, 11:15 AM
So today is the 15th anniversary of Satoshi Nakamoto's last known email to Mike Hearn. I decided to drop my novel on this date. It’s titled The Day Satoshi Returned. Here’s the basic idea: In 2044, the Genesis address gets active again. No coins are being moved around or sold. Just a legit cryptographic signature from that one BTC address that could really shake things up. I wrote it as a work of fiction, but there’s a big question that comes with it: If that really went down, what would you need as proof that Satoshi Nakamoto had actually returned?
2 Reply Quote Share
sam.bullSenior Member
Posts: 390 · Reputation: 1323
#2Jul 18, 2017, 05:34 PM
Nothing really TBS Even if he signs or moves his coins It just means someone might have had access to them though the likelihood of it been satoshi Is high but not absolute. I doubt I would believe anybody that comes out as satoshi But at least accept one that was uncovered.
2 Reply Quote Share
sage_moonSenior Member
Posts: 273 · Reputation: 1371
#3Jul 18, 2017, 10:10 PM
If jesus were to descend from heaven and perform a miracle in front of everyone, we would still view it with skepticism. The same would happen with Satoshi; there would be people who would say, "No, it's not him," because the legend would become human. Even if he arrived with the private keys to their wallets, people would still doubt and claim that he could have found them on an old PC, or that Satoshi himself simply gave them to him. What I mean by this is that it is something very, very difficult to prove to the masses, in my opinion.
2 Reply Quote Share
whale51Member
Posts: 5 · Reputation: 97
#4Jul 19, 2017, 12:59 AM
I agree. A signature could prove key control, while identity itself remains unresolved.
3 Reply Quote Share
whale51Member
Posts: 5 · Reputation: 97
#5Jul 19, 2017, 07:09 AM
Interesting perspective. You mean that once someone becomes a legend, evidence no longer settles the question?
2 Reply Quote Share
ColdViperSenior Member
Posts: 128 · Reputation: 842
#6Jul 19, 2017, 09:57 AM
In my opinion, nothing like that will happen, and the current success of Bitcoin is not based on the identity of the name Satoshi, but rather on its acceptance and financial independence, which has established a strong foundation, If someone came today and proved that he is Satoshi, then nothing like that will happen, and they know very well when to do what, they must have a plan for this! Who created Bitcoin is no longer determined by its significance or impact, although it is a man-made technology but Its popularity has naturally happened and no one deliberately popularized it, but it has become popular on its own.
2 Reply Quote Share
0xN0nceSenior Member
Posts: 421 · Reputation: 1069
#7Jul 19, 2017, 03:43 PM
I like the idea of that novel, where the world is hanging in the balance because control over Satoshi's wallet could really move the markets. Hmm. Interesting take, as long as it's really just fictional and not true IRL.   It might not be enough to prove the identity, but definitely having control of the wallet would raise the interest and confidence beyond the key control. If they could add the PGP keys used in the early emails, that would be the game changer.
2 Reply Quote Share
whale51Member
Posts: 5 · Reputation: 97
#8Jul 19, 2017, 08:06 PM
Yeah, definitely fiction And I didn’t focus on it as a market reaction. By 2044, Bitcoin is already the standard, so the bigger shock is not whether Bitcoin survives, but what his return does to power and everything built around it. Combining that with the early PGP keys would make it much harder to dismiss. I hadn’t thought of that! If I were writing it again, I’d probably include it.
0 Reply Quote Share
whale51Member
Posts: 5 · Reputation: 97
#9Jul 20, 2017, 12:16 AM
That’s fair and I agree that Bitcoin is bigger than Satoshi’s identity now. What interested me was not whether Bitcoin survives, but what that kind of identity proof would do to the institutions and power built around it in a world already living on a Bitcoin standard.
0 Reply Quote Share
john.cobraHero Member
Posts: 408 · Reputation: 2145
#10Jul 20, 2017, 01:37 AM
You have at least one problem in your story, which is that there are concrete proposals to freeze all coins at vulnerable addresses in fear of quantum computers. This would include all addresses that are connected to Satoshi coins, and thus the threat of Satoshi appearing and doing something with those coins would disappear. However, as others have already written, the fact that someone would sign a message from an address from the Genesis block does not mean that it would be Satoshi, but someone who came into possession of their private keys. I believe that Satoshi has no evil plans with these coins and that people should not be afraid of him but of other people who are accumulating huge amounts of BTC these days.
2 Reply Quote Share
jake.seedFull Member
Posts: 180 · Reputation: 698
#11Jul 20, 2017, 09:58 PM
It has really come to a point that we don’t even want to know who Satoshi is, anyone who claims to be him even with the proof of signing a signature on his wallet address or push money effectively no matter how little, doesn’t really make it convincing enough that he’s the one. As long as he’ll be known and the publicity is going to be him then most people don’t ever want to meet him or even want to know what he looks like. What matters now most more than Satoshi is that Bitcoin remains forever and nothing alters its operation, and this can only happen when Satoshi is not know and remains in hidden forever.
2 Reply Quote Share

Related topics