Saylor Loses $4 Billion in Net Worth

7 replies 257 views
ColdViperSenior Member
Posts: 128 · Reputation: 842
#1Mar 27, 2026, 11:51 PM
No matter how much he lost, he could bounce back and double his profits with this project. That $4 billion will turn into $8 billion again pretty quickly. The huge drop is because of the sharp fall in Bitcoin's price and how MicroStrategy's stock is doing, both of which Saylor is heavily invested in.
2 Reply Quote Share
paul2017Senior Member
Posts: 218 · Reputation: 1426
#2Mar 28, 2026, 02:20 AM
The sustainability of Strategy requires a rising Bitcoin price because of the preferred share dividends and the interest on its debt. Has anyone calculated a  Bitcoin price at which Strategy collapses?
0 Reply Quote Share
alex.shardLegendary
Posts: 1019 · Reputation: 5623
#3Mar 28, 2026, 05:06 AM
I do not know how to make the calculation but only what I know was that bitcoin got to $69000 in 2021 but as bitcoin fall in 2022, many people thought that Strategy will collapse. Bitcoin continued to fall in 2022 and it got to $15400 but Strategy did not collapse. Some people like Peter Schiff are raising such panic again but if they fail again, it will not be a surprise for me.
3 Reply Quote Share
greg.bearMember
Posts: 59 · Reputation: 203
#4Mar 28, 2026, 09:23 AM
What happened is a product of the market condition and this has not disturbed nor deterred MSTR from its strategic purchase of bitcoin, they also had a recent purchase of 8,178 BTC worth about $835.6 million. Bitcoin is for the future, at least that is what Saylor believes and is always acting it out, I kinda like his stand on that. Bitcoin critics would always promote panic when the prices are crashing and the story now is about the decline in his assets worth. Next time bitcoin price starts soaring high the media would be validating MSTR for their relentless purchase.
4 Reply Quote Share
1t5_omegaHero Member
Posts: 614 · Reputation: 3883
#5Mar 28, 2026, 11:40 AM
Strategy's preferred shares are overcollateralized. I don't remember the exact number right now, but the price could fall by 70 or 80% without causing any problems, and that's assuming that Strategy did not take any action during that decline. If you want, check out fillippone's thread where we discuss this in detail. What is obvious, and something Saylor has repeatedly acknowledged, is that his company works if Bitcoin works. If Bitcoin starts to fall relentlessly and goes to zero, as Peter Schiff predicts, Strategy will also go to hell. But investors in Strategy, me included, are bullish on Bitcoin, leaving aside that this year's price is quite disappointing.
1 Reply Quote Share
diamond365Full Member
Posts: 136 · Reputation: 744
#6Mar 28, 2026, 04:38 PM
Do you mean about Strategy's portfolio? Saylor's wealth is from Strategy company and also his individual investment portfolio with many bitcoins he has too. Strategy's tracker. This one is about his individual Bitcoin portfolio. Michael Saylor net worth.
3 Reply Quote Share
vault_alphaHero Member
Posts: 363 · Reputation: 2228
#7Mar 28, 2026, 06:19 PM
The news did not come to me as a surprise, for I knew it would often happen like that. But the good news is that his personal asset that plummeted now is the same asset that will soar over the time, and the same headlines will share it the way they do now. Though it might take several months or over a year in many cases. This is the issue when your asset is hanging in balance to online assets like Stocks, Crypto etc, you might be the $30B rich today, and be $7bB rich tomorrow. My only issue now is that MicroStrategy is being linked to all these. If Bitcoin buys, the company's stock will rise, but if Bitcoin sells, it will fall, which is not so cool, in my opinion, because no one knows tomorrow, and the effect might be devasting more than Bitcoin at time.
2 Reply Quote Share
SwiftMatr1xFull Member
Posts: 59 · Reputation: 474
#8Mar 28, 2026, 07:02 PM
He has had dramatic rise and falls in his net-worth over the decades, he was barely a billionaire 3-4 years ago, he will be fine if a crash in the market affects the one asset he has aggressively backed through his company, he should have also expected it and created buffers as this has been the reality of bitcoin for many years. - Jay -
0 Reply Quote Share

Related topics